Home / How We Rate
How We Rate Australian Online Casinos | Our Testing Standards
By Isla Hartigan
Last updated 11 September 2026
Our Rating Method Summary Table
| Criteria | Weight | What We Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Banking & Payout Speed | 25% | Real withdrawal timing, fees, AUD support |
| Licensing & Security | 20% | Verifiable licence, encryption, player protections |
| Bonus Fairness | 20% | Wagering, win caps, game contribution, time limits |
| Game Selection | 15% | Pokies, live dealer, table games, crash titles |
| Mobile Experience | 10% | Performance on Android and iOS |
| Customer Support | 10% | Response speed and problem resolution |
Minimum score for recommendation: 75 out of 100.
On this page
- Why Our Approach Is Different
- Step One: Licensing and Security Checks
- Step Two: Banking and Payout Speed
- Step Three: Bonus Fairness
- Step Four: Game Selection and Software Quality
- Step Five: Mobile Performance
- Step Six: Customer Support Quality
- How the Scores Come Together
- Our Commitment to Players
- Tell Us About Your Experience
Why Our Approach Is Different
The Australian online casino market is crowded with attractive offers. Many hide unfavourable terms behind polished marketing. Some never pay out at all.
We do not rely on press releases or promotional material. We open real accounts, deposit real money, claim real bonuses and request real withdrawals. Then we report what actually happened — including when the answer is unflattering.
We review platforms including Kingaud, Tonygame7, BSB007, TCL99 and Roospin. This page explains the framework behind every score we publish.
Step One: Licensing and Security Checks
Every review begins here. If a platform cannot demonstrate a legitimate licence, it does not progress further.
| What We Verify | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Active Licence | Confirms the operator is authorised |
| Licence Number | Must be visible and traceable to the regulator |
| Privacy Policy | Clear procedures for handling player data |
| SSL Encryption | Protects transactions and personal details |
| Responsible Gambling Tools | Deposit limits, self-exclusion, reality checks |
Casinos that obscure their licensing or describe themselves as unregulated are rejected outright. We also check for regulatory violations and patterns of player complaints.
We recognise licences from Curaçao eGaming, the Malta Gaming Authority and comparable jurisdictions. Australia does not issue domestic online casino licences, so verifying the legitimacy of offshore credentials is essential.
Step Two: Banking and Payout Speed
This carries the heaviest weighting in our system because it is where players are most often let down.
| Banking Factor | What We Test |
|---|---|
| AUD Support | Casinos transacting in Australian dollars score higher |
| Local Methods | PayID, POLi, Neosurf, bank transfer, cards |
| Deposit Speed | Instant processing expected across all methods |
| Withdrawal Speed | Under 24 hours scores highest; over 48 hours is penalised |
| Withdrawal Limits | Caps below A$20,000 are considered restrictive |
We time withdrawals precisely. We also track whether fees are applied, whether verification demands are reasonable, and whether payouts are stalled without explanation.
A casino with a pattern of slow or obstructive withdrawals will score poorly regardless of how strong it looks elsewhere.
Step Three: Bonus Fairness
A large bonus is worthless if the terms make it impossible to withdraw.
| Bonus Factor | Fair Range | Penalty Range |
|---|---|---|
| Wagering Requirements | 20x to 35x | Above 40x loses points |
| Game Contribution | Slots at 100%, tables contributing fairly | Table games at 0% |
| Maximum Win Limits | Above A$10,000 | Below A$5,000 |
| Validity Period | 21 to 30 days | Under 14 days |
We also determine whether wagering applies to the bonus alone or to deposit plus bonus combined. That distinction dramatically changes real value, and it is one of the most common sources of player frustration.
Free spins, cashback and loyalty schemes are assessed on the same basis. Transparent terms earn higher scores than generous-sounding offers buried in fine print.
Step Four: Game Selection and Software Quality
| Game Category | What We Look For |
|---|---|
| Pokies | Classic slots, video pokies, jackpots, Megaways |
| Live Dealer | Baccarat, blackjack, roulette, game shows |
| Table Games | Multiple variants of blackjack, roulette and poker |
| Crash Games | Aviator, Spaceman and similar titles |
We favour libraries built on reputable providers — Pragmatic Play, Playtech, Microgaming, NetEnt, BGaming, Evolution Gaming and Hacksaw Gaming among them.
Critically, we only recommend casinos using certified random number generators verified by eCOGRA, iTech Labs or GLI. Provider branding alone is not enough. We check where games are actually served from.
Step Five: Mobile Performance
Most Australian players access casinos on their phones. We test on both Android and iOS.
| Mobile Factor | What We Test |
|---|---|
| App vs Mobile Web | Stable apps score higher, but strong mobile sites are acceptable |
| Game Performance | Crashes, freezes and lag during play |
| Live Dealer Streams | Must remain smooth on mobile connections |
| Banking | Deposit and withdrawal functions on mobile |
The full banking process must work without friction on a phone. If you cannot withdraw comfortably from your device, that is a meaningful failure.
Step Six: Customer Support Quality
We contact support across different days and hours to build a complete picture.
| Support Factor | Excellent | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat Response | Under 2 minutes | Over 10 minutes |
| Email Response | Under 12 hours | Over 24 hours |
| Problem Resolution | Clear, actionable answers | Vague or evasive replies |
| Language | English with Australian-friendly hours | No English support |
We raise genuine issues — such as a withdrawal pending for five days — to see how problems are handled. Agents who resolve matters clearly score higher than those who deflect.
How the Scores Come Together
| Category | Weight |
|---|---|
| Banking & Payout Speed | 25% |
| Licensing & Security | 20% |
| Bonus Fairness | 20% |
| Game Selection & Quality | 15% |
| Mobile Experience | 10% |
| Customer Support | 10% |
Only platforms scoring 75 or above earn a recommendation. We publish both passing and failing scores, and our full reviews explain how each total was reached.
Our Commitment to Players
| Commitment | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Real Money Testing | We deposit and withdraw our own funds |
| No Paid Reviews | Positive coverage cannot be bought |
| Honest Reporting | Failures are reported as failures |
| Regular Updates | Reviews are revisited as operators change |
We fund our own testing. Bonus terms, payout speeds and game libraries shift constantly, so we return to platforms periodically to keep our information accurate.
Tell Us About Your Experience
Played at a casino we reviewed? Had a different outcome? Let us know. Anonymous player feedback sharpens our ratings and surfaces issues we might otherwise miss.
Reach us through the support page on this website. Your experience helps keep our recommendations reliable for the wider Australian player community.